Blog

The Bishop Wants To Be My Friend

by mraynes

…Or at least he wants to be my facebook friend.  The request came through last night and it has left me rather conflicted.

On the one hand, I really like my bishop.  He hasn’t been bishop very long but he has always been friendly.  He often says nice things about my babies which is always a sure way into my good graces.  His family lives directly behind us and they have graciously put up with the lovely screaming phase my Monster is in right now.  That is, I’m almost positive it wasn’t them who called the police on us.  Also, his youngest daughter is my favorite babysitter.

On the other hand, by adding him as a facebook friend, I give him a direct link to my personal blog and then to this blog.  I have not written anything at either place that would get me in trouble but I wonder if giving him access would have a censoring effect.  I feel that I already self-censor a good deal but I would hate to shy away from writing about difficult topics for fear that I’ll get called into the Bishop’s office.

Now I may be humoring myself that he would even care.  Also, my bishop might already know about my personal blog as it seems to be a pretty open secret among the ward.  (Thank, Mom!)

So what would you do?  How do you deal with new technology changing your interpersonal relationships?

11 COMMENTS

  1. You can “friend” people and limit what they can see on your FB profile. I’ve done that a few times with students or acquaintances.

    But I’m all for letting it all show to whoever wants to see my online presence. It’s probably been a bit of a shocker for my extended family to discover my rather extensive online life, but I’m not too worried about it.

  2. You can always accept him as a friend – so as to not hurt his feelings – and then quickly unfriend him. He may never even realize he’s been unfriended if he has lots of friends on facebook. (You can see the lengths I go to be non-confrontational at times…. probably not healthy.)

  3. Mraynes,
    One of the issues here is privacy, another is integrity. Obviously we can’t be super-anonymous on the internet, especially here at Exponent with our faces on the sidebar! But, we also have to reconcile within ourselves what we believe in and stay true to that in all circumstances.

    My bishop (who is probably going to release me from cub scouts tonight, because I asked), has a lot of integrity. Every year he and his wife watch all of the movies nominated for an Oscar for Best Picture, even if they’re rated R. He was just called as bishop a few weeks ago and that hasn’t changed. I think that’s integrity. (Perhaps not as it’s taught in YW’s lessons).

    But, as for his desire to read your blog, or the amount of time he could actually spend doing it, I don’t know. I imagine bishops don’t have that kind of time, but maybe they do. We’ve had a few commenting around here.

  4. we have a whole ward group on FB now, with about 50 members. provides TMI sometimes, but also a good way to keep in touch with everyone. the bishop hasn’t joined yet…

  5. I’m married to our ward’s bishop, and we both have facebook friended many people in the ward and especially the youth. It provides a place for the hallway chitchat that we might have missed.
    As Bishop, you’re under such sucritiny that the worry is for the other way around: that you as a ward member, may see something on HIS profile or in HIS interactions w/people that you don’t like! And I agree with the comment that he probably doesn’t have time to do too much facebooking.
    Another bishop in our stake facebooks everyone in his ward a lot… it’s his way of staying in touch b/c he travels extensively.

  6. Thanks for the tips, guys! I had no idea that there was such a thing as limiting my profile; it’s good to have an in with technologically intelligent people. On further reflection, I don’t think I will limit my profile, I am who I am and I need to work on being more open with people. This will be a good exercise for me. Thanks for letting me have a momentary freakout.

  7. One of my friends was called into her bishop’s office because he was “concerned” about her after reading her blog. She was not happy about that.

  8. I’m just not comfortable opening the door to so many people to potentially stalk me. I’ll accept friendships of family or actual friends. Acquaintances?
    Maybe he feels like he “should” put all the ward people on his friends list so he doesn’t exclude people.
    Personally, I would turn it down. I think it is inapropriate to feel obligated to be facebook friends with someone.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Click to subscribe for new post alerts.

Click to subscribe to our magazine, in circulation since 1974.

Related Posts

My censored blog posts are back.

A little over two years ago, in an attempt to stifle my contributions to the Mormon women's ordination movement, my stake president required me...

Twitter Weekly Updates for 2012-09-23

From our archive: Poll: Work http://t.co/zbQGUUwt #women # From our archive: The WE canvas http://t.co/320x81cV # From our archive: Relief Society Lesson 41: The...

Relief Society Lesson: More on the Life and Ministry of Lorenzo Snow

I love this lesson series. I love the different approaches different writers take, and the insights they have  that I'd miss on my own....

Twitter Weekly Updates for 2011-06-19

An interesting look at what the SlutWalk protests mean about the future of feminism: http://t.co/yUIQwhg # at nine moons, @mfranti wonders how good LDS folk...
submit guest post
Submit a Guest Blog Post
Announcements
Announcements
subscribe to our magazine
Subscribe to Our Magazine
Social Media Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com